notomayor notomayor
Our diagnostic updates continue after 1500 Hrs GMT today Sunday 24 October 2010. Unless there is a breaking item or more.
15 minutes ago Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
We shall show that the "East London Advertiser" was editorially misled and abused by someone or more than one person doing the reverse too!
16 minutes ago Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
We shall show that the "East London Advertiser" was editorially misled and abused by someone or more than one person in planting PR items
17 minutes ago Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
We are publishing these posts as the gist of our exclusive examination of the evidence of the role of the local newspaper over 50 years
18 minutes ago Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
We examine OTHERS on that "list". We show the positive coverage given via the "East London Advertiser" to the lone, the sole Lib Dem Cllr
20 minutes ago Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
We record the undeniable that Peter Golds has been given unparalleled positive publicity by that "newspaper"
21 minutes ago Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
We RECORD THE UNDENIABLE FACT that the "Conservative" councillor on Tower Hamlets Council, Peter Golds, is a "prominent" beneficiary
23 minutes ago Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
We shall NEXT list the "beneficiaries" of that dirty filthy "sucking up" to the "cocky" "star" of the various times staged via the "paper"
26 minutes ago Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
Truth has suffered from that dirty, filthy propensity that has been exhibited by the relevant "cocky" newcomer and their "clientele"....
28 minutes ago Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
That "sucking up" has resulted in the creation of the "most important person in Tower Hamlets" syndrome solely linked with the paper...
30 minutes ago Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
If anything, the main evidence is that all the councillors concerned have tried to "flatter" the "East London Advertiser" by "sucking up"...
33 minutes ago Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
The "East London Advertiser" has published many serious inaccuracies but it has not been truly challenged by a single 'local councillor'
34 minutes ago Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
By the operation of one of the plainest of weaknesses in the human 'character'! The greed in the politico & the need in them for publicity
36 minutes ago Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
So how has the core failure by the "local" "East London Advertiser" been allowed to take place, go unchallenged and continue?
39 minutes ago Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
The most inaccurately reported agency in those FIFTY years has been the local Tower Hamlets Council which came into existence in the 1960s
40 minutes ago Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
Editor after Editor has failed to recognise the truth about any of the agencies paid for by the public and in the name of the public
42 minutes ago Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
Our diagnosis in this series is based on the study of the “East London Advertiser” as published during the last FIFTY years.
44 minutes ago Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
It is to that false, perniciously manufactured image of the East End of London that the "East London Advertiser" has "fitted" real life...
49 minutes ago Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
For that reason, the "East London Advertiser" has projected an image of the East End TO THE East End community as manufactured by outsiders
51 minutes ago Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
The "East London Advertiser" has been as alien to the truth of the battles that have gone on for universal human rights in the East End....
52 minutes ago Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
The "East London Advertiser" has always been politically tentative, because it has been written by outsiders to the East End community.....
55 minutes ago Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
In all this, Peter Golds was treated as if he were an Oona King, "aggrieved and wronged"! That was the agenda for disharmony mounted in 2008
57 minutes ago Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
Peter Golds, formally the core-group-leader of the "Conservatives" "in" Tower Hamlets via "local Council", aided and peddled the Bliar NEC!
59 minutes ago Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
In that 2008 propaganda blitz via the "East London Advertiser", the seeds had been sown for the later assault on the community in 2010
1 hour ago Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
Golds CRAVES 'the media spot' and is one of three "aggrieved" Tower Hamlets "leaders" featured in the "East London Advertiser" in 2008...
1 hour ago Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
Golds is on the record as having failed to reply to our many questions that were put to him before 6 May 2010
6 hours ago Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
The fanatically OVER-hyped [by the pernicious bloggers in the 'mainstream' 'meeja'] the Tower Hamlets Tory Peter Golds has faked his stance
6 hours ago Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
None of these channels has broadcast any of the facts of the community's comments. The so-called 'callers' R staged tokens. Full stop
6 hours ago Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
The commonest code to be broken has been the one about impartiality and accuracy. ALL these channels have broadcast untruths and lies.
7 hours ago Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
We name those channels first. They are "Channel S" and sub-channels 'Channel i', NTV and ATN Bangla and the Bangla TV channel. OFCOM rules!
7 hours ago Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
We note, at 0354GMTSunday24Oct2010 a number of 'panellists' slotted in by the 'ethnicity-linked' 'satellite' TV channels, broke rules
7 hours ago Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
We believe it right that we advise Abbas Uddin 'Helal' to set a positive example by withdrawing that remark and apologising to Ms Shawcroft
22 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
We record our complete disapproval of the description by Abbas Uddin 'Helal' of Christine Shawcroft as "a mad goat in our Party"
22 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
History tells us that Abbas Uddin 'Helal' has been one of only a handful of beneficiaries of the otherwise inexplicable help of women
22 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
Amazing to note that the Jayhatist-Crusader bloggers who just failed to execute their coup against the community did not see that volley!
22 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
Have issues with t’ same Christine Shawcroft. And many others in ‘our’ [!] Party. We never called them either a goat or a mad one!
22 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
Abbas Uddin called Christine Shawcroft a 'mad goat in our Party' AS TRANSLATED by AADHIKARonline. Not as 'described' by some Lutfur backers
22 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
Abbas Uddin 'Helal' PRIDED in his ability, without any show of remorse, to dismiss Christine Shawcroft as a 'mad goat in our Party'
22 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
Citing ES [previous post, link] London EVENING STANDARD for, amongst other lunatic contents, the utterly ironic linkage of Abbas to madness!
22 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
Citing ES http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23890660-shambles-is-down-to-labours-bugbear-and-8201-the-fear-of-looking-racist.do
22 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
BHANGEELAAR! Campaign organiser Muhammad Haque had predicted on 05 January 2010: That the fakers would cause a "mayor by default"! More soon
22 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
Breaking news: Among the defamers! We list the bloggers whom Lutfur Rahman may be able to sue for libel. Details sourced from here today
22 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
BHANGEELAAR! Telling "East London Advertiser" on "low voter turnout" at “poll” http://notoundemocraticmayorintowerhamlets.blogspot.com
22 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
Brief statement by BHANGEELAAR! ‘Low voter turnout’ shows “NO to mayor” campaign’s success [Link next]
22 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
Check out the latest editions of our constitutional law action bulletin on http://notoundemocraticmayorintowerhamlets.blogspot.com
22 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
NEXT: another exclusive document about how "Dr" Kevan Collins, the "Returning Officer" in Tower hamlets failed to do his duty to curb lies
22 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
Who will hold those violators to account?
22 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
The propaganda against the community in Tower Hamlets as carried out via a number of 'bloggers' has been in breach of all the UNO Charters
22 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
The reason being that when nobody holding any position of power shows due respect to ordinary people, where do the people go to?
22 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
We are asking these questions from the "inner city". "deprived" or "one of the most deprived" "boroughs". Tower Hamlets. For a v good reason
22 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
What can the UNO do about all those Charters that are floating aboiut in the name of the 'world body'? Does any regime really care?
22 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
Does anyone know what the true 'motto' of the Daily Telegraph had been at its foundation? Has the 'motto' been observed or trampled on?
22 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
Reminding Channel 4 TV to deliver on their obligations to tell the truth. Why had they filmed the NO to Mayor demo on 6 Feb 2010?
22 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
Asking if Ken Livingstone has delivered on his claims as made at the Brady Centre on 6 February 2010 when he condemned Tower Hamlets Council
22 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
We are also publishing the relevnat evidential materails including the email dated Wednesday 02 June 2010 we had sent to Abbas Uddin 'Helal'
22 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
Publishing the original exclusive evidence on http://notoundemocraticmayorintowerhamlets.blogspot.com all today Friday 22 October 2010
22 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
WORLD EXCLUSIVES! Only by BHANGEELAAR! Legal evidence of how the 'elected mayor' thing has been being IMOPOSED by the Labour Party itself!
22 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
We are publishing the full texts of our evidential and again vindicated email ass sent to Andrew Gilligan on 17 September 2010. Link next
22 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
BHANGEELAAR! Will publish item by item rebuttal to the piece as by-lined to the EVENING STANDARD's David Cohen who repeated untruths again
22 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
BHANGEELAAR! Will publish here in the next hours a selection of the extracts or full texts of the legal Qs to Kevan Collins
22 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
BHANGEELAAR! Received no answers from Kevan Collins to the many urgent, relevant, legal & constitutional law questions we put on referendum
22 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
BHANGEELAAR! Gave several opportunities to Tower Hamlets town clerk ['chief executive'] Kevan Collins to do the lawful thing in context.
22 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
More items of evidence for Labour Party NEC, the UK electoral commission and the other constitutional law enforcing authorities here soon.
22 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
BHANGEELAAR! Made the representations in due accordance with the law, ethics, morality, democracy and accountability. Who 'vanished' sheets?
22 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
BHANGEELAAR! Wanted the copies of the attendance sheets as key items of evidence to show who attended the "NO" campaign meetings.
22 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
The reply from that individual has been, so far, and repeatedly stated to us that the attendance sheets had "gone missing"
22 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
BHANGEELAAR! Asked one constantly present member of the group around Abbas Uddin 'Helal' to make copies of the attendance sheets available
22 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
BHANGEELAAR! Made plain in the communications that they formed parts of the constitutional law actions about the constitution of t' Council
22 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
BHANGEELAAR! sent a number of messages, by text and by email to Abbas Uddin 'Helal' between 05 January 2010 and 21 October 2010. See more
22 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
BHANGEELAAR! Will be publishing as part of the evidence being put to the Labour Party NEC today a number of messages we had sent to Abbas...
22 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
The Muhammad Haque picture on the left shows Abbas Uddin 'Helal' holding a copy of the BHANGEELAAR! leaflet on 11 April 2010 in London E1
22 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
See our comment at the end of DaveHill's latest blog as filed online from the York Hall London http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/davehillblog
22 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
BHANGEELAAR! has begun the constitutional law action process re those who sabotaged due process under covers of the Labour Party
22 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
BHANGEELAAR! Statement to Labour Party NEC will appear here overnight.
21 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
More on the "East London Advertiser" and the "London EVENING STANDARD" here shortly
21 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
BHANGEELAAR! tells the "East London Advertiser" to lift the barrier on its web site so we can expose the sham that is today's imposed
21 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
What the Labour Party NEC should now do is to institute a genuine process to EXPEL all the crooks that it knows have been in positions
21 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
ASEERTING that "Liared" Alli exposes the core of the morality-free 'criteria' that Tony Bliar must have applied when making him a "peer"
21 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
Citing on Alli http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/mps-expenses/8078476/Expenses-peers-expenses-cheats-were-victims-of-racism.html
21 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
»
notomayor notomayor
London EVENING STANDARD carries a disgracefully inaccurate, smearing piece about Tower Hamlets hijacking the SSBA's claim! See more later
21 Oct Favorite Reply Delete
notomayor
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment