BHANGEELAAR! to Guardian London Blogger Dave Hill about Hill's CIF piece about Tower Hamlets
You have said the following:
“Rahman's detractors also claim that despite his very long and very recent Labour past, he's really a Respect party stooge. They cite the campaign to bring the mayoral local government system to Tower Hamlets in the first place being driven by Respect – and wealthy collaborators – with the obvious aim of winning the ensuing poll. They add that many names on the petition raised were false. All of this is true. However, there weren't enough false names to invalidate the petition and the ensuing referendum held on general election day this year produced a 60.3% "yes" vote on a 62.1% turnout – another big endorsement.”
All of your assertions in the quoted bit above must be refuted and put in context.
We question the evidential basis for the entire quoted bit. In particular we have serious disagreement on the facts and legally with you over the claim: “there weren't enough false names to invalidate the petition and the ensuing referendum held on general election day this year produced a 60.3% "yes" vote on a 62.1% turnout – another big endorsement.”
No comments:
Post a Comment