1615 Hrs GMT
London
Wednesday
29 September 2010-09-29
Editor © Muhammad Haque
BHANGEELAAR! Exclusively predicting that "Dr" Kevan Collins will 'volunteer' his regrets over the tainted ‘referendum’ dated 06 May 2010 that he failed to scrutinise.
It may be mentioned in context that "Dr" Kevan Collins enjoyed a strange promotion via Channel 4 as a ridiculously dressed up "Undercover Boss" an edition of which featuring him was so unconvincing, misleading, untruthful that a serious court action can still be mounted against the conceivers of that fraudulence as well as against all the relevant participants in that grand fakery.
Informed observers have already noted the fact that Oona King had been installed at Channel 4 as the Channel’s ‘diversity’ ‘head’.
As Kevan Collins received the plug via Channel 4, questions have been devised as to what, if any. part the aforesaid Oona King might have played in placing any diversion from the truth - under cover of her diversity’ 'expertise [NOT!!!!!]’.- at the expense of the ordinary people in Tower Hamlets whose rights and say were severely insulted via that undercover Outrage.
This last question will be explored and the facts established in context.
Once that has been done, the findings shall be published.
It is also to be pointed out that the manufacturers of the Gilligan-fronted edition of the much derided Channel 4 Dispatches slot [March 2010] contained stills that looked very much as if they had been created from footage filmed on Saturday 6 February 2010.
Or that the stills were made at the events only SLIGHTLY shown in that edition of the “Dispatches” as broadcast by Channel 4 – the demonstration held in the streets and in Hanbury Street [outside the Brady Centre] to demand that there be NO elected mayor in Tower Hamlets.
On that basis, we can assert that Andrew Gilligan - of the London DAILY TELEGRAPH group and the many known and unknown elements egging him on to carry on against democracy in inner city Tower Hamlets – may indeed be heading for a kind of surprising outcome to their crusade [!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!] that none of their ‘hailed’ ‘investigative’ assaults on inner city democracy may be anticipating!
Why has Gilligan been supportive of an elected mayor thing when he knows that the alleged referendum was not conducted properly?
Why has Gilligan been silent on the fact that ABBAS UDDIN ‘Helal’ has been quoted as having submitted a detailed list of alleged allegations to the UK Labour Party NEC in which he [Abbas Uddin ‘Helal’] makes a positive assertion [we say he ‘makes…’ because the communication containing the alleged allegations is signed by Abbas Uddin ‘Helal’ even though we know that he did not write most of it] to the effect that the REFERENDUM of 6 May 2010 had significant irregularities in it?
Shouldn’t those irregularities be investigated by ‘the authorities’?
Or will a...Or is it the case that…. a duly instituted and lawful investigation stand in the way of some surprisingly hyper-active candidates doing their utmost to get into the COVETED office of an ‘elected’ mayor?
[To be continued]
Wednesday, 29 September 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment