2355 Hrs GMT
London
Sunday
05 September 2010
Editor © Muhammad Haque
BHANGEELAAR! Again exclusively reporting that the so-called “united Labour Party” as claimed in the past 24 hours and in the context of Tower Hamlets is a sham. It is a sham claim. This has been the case FOR MANY YEARS.
The label “Party” is not genuine. The world ‘The Labour Party’, as far as Tower Hamlets goes, has been a front and the bureaucracy that controls it in Tower Hamlets has been a secret cabal for years.
Only in the past two years has the bureaucratic figurehead emerged as being a man called Ken Clark.
We shall be unmasking the cabal in context in the next reports
In the meantime, we tell Andrew Gilligan – the ‘born again’ ‘journalist’ [who styles himself as the London Daily Telegraph’s “London Editor”] to get down to doing some factual reporting about Tower Hamlets from the point of view of ordinary people and find out what actually happened over the so-called opposition by Abbas Uddin [‘Helal’], Michael Keith, Sirajul Islam [to name only three – there are many more who can be name don their public record] to a directly elected mayor system in Tower Hamlets.
These three named candidates all appeared to be OPPOSED to the mayor system.
Yet EVEN before the actual formal claim was published about the ‘referendum’ ‘results’ dated 6 May 2010, ALL THREE were being touted for as possible ‘candidates’ for the “Labour Party’ to seek election to be the ‘first directly elected mayor’ in the name of the people of Tower Hamlets.
There are MANY questions and issues involved in the matter of changing the constitution of Tower Hamlets Council away from a less autocratic one to a very autocratic one.
Yet the questions and issues have been ALL swept under the carpet by the ‘journalists’ allegedly reporting on the ‘mayor’ 'phenomenon'.
Why have the ‘journalists’ done so?
[To be continued]
No comments:
Post a Comment